top of page

Summary Point

Why is God the best explanation for the origin of life?

Subpoints

It is statistically impossible for life to have originated naturally from non-life – a divine Creator is necessary.

  1. The scientific Law of Biogenesis says that life only comes from life.1

    1. This scientific law is firmly established by all known observations. In order to believe that life came from non-life, we would need to reject all known observations. The beginning of life seems to require a supernatural beginning.

    2. Scientist Walt Brown summarizes this point:

      1. “Spontaneous generation (the emergence of life from nonliving matter) has never been observed. All observations have shown that life comes only from life.”1

  2. Scientific estimates for life arising from non-life by random chance (spontaneous generation) are statistically impossible – because the molecular building blocks are extremely complex.

    • It's important to note that statistics identified below are clearly subject to changes as more studies are done; however, the overall point remains the same:

    • Scientist Fred Hoyle estimated that the chance of spontaneous generation of proteins for life is 1 in 10^40,000.3 That is one chance in 10 with 40,000 zeros, a number beyond comprehension. Mathematicians generally believe that anything with a lower probably than 1 / 10^50 is a statistically impossible by chance.

      • “The likelihood of the formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40 thousand naughts [zeros] after it. It is enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution. There was no primeval soup, neither on this planet nor on any other, and if the beginnings of life were not random they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence.”3

      • Fred Hoyle equated the chance of this happening “…is about the same as the probability that a tornado sweeping through a junk yard could assemble a 747 from the contents therein.”3

    • Wait, it gets worse!

      • According to Mark Eastman and Chuck Missler, Hoyle’s estimate does not include DNA, RNA or the walls of a cell.2 Consequently, there is an even lower possibility once these factors are included. They claim a better estimate might be from Harold Morowitz, a Yale University physicist, who estimated the chance of spontaneous generation of a life coming from nonlife is one chance in 10^100,000,000,000.4 This number is incomprehensible and statistically impossible.

    • Francis Crick, co-discover of DNA, admitted in 1982 that life from non-life is seemingly a miracle:

      • “An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have had to have been satisfied to get it going.”5

  3. The simplest life is too complex to have arisen by random natural events.

    • Scientist Michael Denton says that even bacterial cells are more complex than anything created by man.

      • “Although the tiniest bacterial cells are incredibly small, weighing less than 10-12 grams, each is in effect a veritable micro-miniaturized factory containing thousands of exquisitely designed pieces of intricate molecular machinery, made up altogether of one hundred thousand million atoms, far more complicated than any machine built by man and absolutely without parallel in the non-living world.”6

  • Atheists resist the natural conclusion of this evidence based on philosophy, not scientific evidence.

    • Scientist Gerard Wald stated the following, “When it comes to the origin of life there are only two possibilities: Creation or spontaneous generation. There is no third way. Spontaneous generation was disproved one hundred years ago, but that leads us to only one other conclusion, that of supernatural creation. We cannot accept that on philosophical grounds; therefore, we choose to believe the impossible: That life arose spontaneously by chance!”7 emphasis added)

Philosophy

Evidence

Links to external resources on this topic:

Anchor 1

Context:

  • If the universe began to exist, then there was a distinct time when life began to exist. Secular science excludes the possibility that God was involved, but has failed to provide an adequate explanation for how life came into being. God is the best explanation.

  • What is a basic definition of life? According to a secular science book, “Being alive means that an organism is able to move, respond, grow, and reproduce.”6 The issue is that the simplest organism to do this is still too complex to have come from chance.

Anchor 2

Sources (complete reference information provided on SOURCE PAGE):

  1. Brown, In the Beginning, p.5 (point 1).

  2. Eastman & Missler, The Creator Beyond Time and Space, p.60-61.

  3. Eastman & Missler, The Creator Beyond Time and Space, p.60 quotes Fred Hoyle, Nature, vol. 294:105, November 12, 1981.

  4. Eastman & Missler, The Creator Beyond Time and Space, p.61 references Harold Morowitz, Energy Flow in Biology (New York; Academic Press, 1968).

  5. Eastman & Missler, The Creator Beyond Time and Space, p.62 quotes Francis Crick, Life Itself-Its Origin and Nature, Futura, London (1982).

  6. Eastman & Missler, The Creator Beyond Time and Space, p.34-35 quotes Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, Adler and Adler, 1986, p.250.

  7. Eastman & Missler, The Creator Beyond Time and Space, p.62 quotes Gerald Wald, “The Origin of Life’, Scientific American (May 1954).

  8. Glanville, All of Science, p.266.

bottom of page